Talk:Mark Rosewater
| This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other concerns about edits related to a living person, please report the issue to the biographies of living persons noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help with issues related to it, please see this page. |
| WikiProject Biography | (Rated C-class) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Magic: The Gathering | (Rated C-class) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Untitled
In hindsight I see that my comments on his controversy were not fully up to Wikipedian standards, but I think it's inappropriate to give the controversy no mention whatsoever. Having played the game for some time, though not so much anymore, I know there are legions (pardon the pun) of "old-schoolers" who see his name as synonymous with everything that is bad about the game. I wholeheartedly believe Wikipedia should include such content. --BDD 18:42, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- If you can word it more neutrally, and perhaps cite a specific source for that opinion, it can probably be added back. The previous version overshadowed the rest of the article with the "controversy" which, frankly, is not Mark's fault alone. -- Netoholic @ 21:21, 2005 Mar 15 (UTC)
[edit] =
Should the article at least make some mention of the fact that some consider him batshit insane? It'd be easy enough to find cites for.
[edit] This article linked from magicthegathering.com
This article was mentioned today on the official Magic: The Gathering site, here. Brace for impact. :) --Ashenai 11:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Why didn't anyone mention that he wrote for "Roseanne"? That comes up in pretty much every article he writes. (Xanitross 13:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC))
- Well, he's not really known for his work for Roseanne. Nonetheless, you're probably right, it could be mentioned. Wanna do the honors? :) --Ashenai 14:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] =
Isn't there a mistake in the article? At the start of the paragraph Magic: The Gathering, there is mention of his freelance work, in 2010 and 2011! Given that these years haven't come to pass, I guess the writer ment 1990 and 1991, but I'm not sure. Could anyone who does know have a look? -- MisteR
[edit] Bill Rose
The article links to a stub for William I. Rose, I don't think it is the right person. 173.67.40.111 (talk) 18:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
