Talk:MirrorMask
| WikiProject Film | (Rated B-class) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referencing and citation: criterion met
Contents |
[edit] Copyvio in plot summary
I don't believe the IMDb actually lends out its material to Wikipedia. I've never seen this before anywhere else in Wikipedia. Right now it remains a copyvio and should be rewritten. Adding "courtesy IMDb" doesn't really mean anything. 23skidoo 14:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
I have requested permission to officialy use the aforementioned summary in this article. Until then, I have removed the summary.Klassykittychick 18:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Evil princess/Shadow self
The part about the evil princess mentions the idea of shadow self and attributes it to Freud. I believe the term shadow self is more of a Jungian idea, but derived from Freudian concepts. I am not a expert in such things but I think it should probably at least be changed to mention both Jung and Freud. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.88.112.114 (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC).
[edit] The Plot
Shouldn't we start talking about the plot? I mean, that is a very important part of the movie! The Quidam 17:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reception section
There should be a separate Reception section, like all the other film wiki pages here, not just a "Release" section. Spiekier (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Alice in Wonderland
This movie has really obvious similarities to Alice in Wonderland. Should they be mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lgrinberg (talk • contribs) 00:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Only if there are reliable sources to verify them, otherwise it'd be original research. --SilentAria talk 01:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
