Talk:Neopets

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article nominee Neopets was one of the good article nominees, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
WikiProject Internet culture  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Video games (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Websites / Computing   
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
 
WikiProject Nickelodeon (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nickelodeon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nickelodeon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / v0.7
WikiProject icon This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Taskforce icon
This article has been selected for Version 0.7 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.
 
 C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Threads older than 100 days may be archived by MiszaBot I.


Contents

[edit] 4chan Raid

4chan is raiding the article, protect it please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.203.4.159 (talk) 05:33, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Fixed, I think the page doesn't need protection right now though. Prodego talk 05:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Krawk Island

Krawk Island Disappearance is listed as a plot, though Snarkie herself said that it was not a plot, but rather a transition.--Rainaleeks (talk) 17:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

[edit] List of plots

What on earth is this about?! This is unnecessary and too much information that does not need to be here. This article really needs a cleanup.. some fans are getting too excited by adding crap to this article. Hiya111 21:41, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

I agree about the cleanup; the plot list, personal pages section, and stuff like that don't need to be here. Anyone needing to know in-depth gameplay info or help can go to the Neodex wiki, Jellyneo, or another fan site. Chevsapher (talk) 03:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I, too, agree; this article has gotten pretty messy and bloated. I guess a valid question is, "How to best go about fixing it?" — UncleBubba T @ C ) 07:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
I took out the Plots/Events section and snipped a little bit of other unnecessary off. The entire Gameplay section is pretty bloated, though, and needs to be rewritten. And anther thing: shouldn't Nickelodeon Virtual Worlds Group be listed as the site owner and receive the Neopets, Inc. redirect?? Chevsapher (talk) 03:15, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Neopets, Inc. redirect

I would like to redirect Neopets, Inc. to Nickelodeon Kids & Family Virtual Worlds Group instead of this page, as it is the company's current name. Any objections/comments? Chevsapher (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Since no one seems to disagree, I'm planning on applying these changes soon. This will entail changing the Developer(s) and Publisher(s) to Nickelodeon Kids & Family Virtual Worlds Group and removing the Neopets, Inc. infobox, as the aforementioned page already includes an almost identical infobox. Chevsapher (talk) 14:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I just went ahead and implemented all changes. This seemed like the best thing to do. Chevsapher (talk) 20:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export