Talk:PlayStation 2

Integrated PS2 in Sony KDL-22PX300

Sony's recently (Dec 2010) released a 22-inch BRAVIA with a PS2 integrated into it. It should be listed as a model variant. sale site here

It seems to be a UK only model. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.206.34 (talk) 22:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I've been meaning to add that myself for a while now, but I'm not quite sure how. Beyond "It's a TV with an integrated PS2" I haven't hear much, so I'm not really sure what to say about it beyond that. Alphathon™ (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

SCPH-9000x in PAL Region

Was the SCPH-9000x model of the PlayStation 2 slim released in Australasia and Europe or was it just released in North America and Japan? -- PK2 (talk) 20:34, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

If memory serves, I think it was released in mainland Europe (i.e. not the UK or Eire… possibly other places too). Not a clue about Aus. Alphathon™ (talk) 21:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

It was actually released in all regions... certainly Australia/New Zealand as the SCPH-90002, and the UK and the Republic of Ireland as the SCPH-90003. 86.183.201.133 (talk) 22:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

Toolbox
dashboard disambig links external links See WP:DEADREF for dead URLs

This review is transcluded from Talk:PlayStation 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: found and fixed one.[1]. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. 00:11, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   This article contains a large number of citation needed tags, some dating back over 3 years. I am quick-failing it on that alone.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Quick fail on WP:GACR #2. Please make sure that articles measure up against the criteria before nominating. If you need help with that, try the releavnt project or a WP:Peer review. Fail GA nomination. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:16, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Hardware revisions as versions (V#)

Exactly how much space should be devoted to what is essentially something invented by modchip vendors? This information is poorly sourced, and will probably remain so forever, and I don't see how its inclusion in the article is necessary. ButOnMethItIs (talk)

The article also completely skips over the fat "+" models (aka V9/V10/V11 or SCPH-5000x) which actually had changes that was advertised and noticable by end users (quieter fan, officially supports DVD movies on "+RW" discs, built in IR eye, i400 removed). It also says "expansion bay of current PS2 models" while the expansion bay was actually removed in V12 (7000x) and later. 83.233.143.154 (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)