Talk:QuakeNet
| WikiProject IRC | (Rated Stub-class, High-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the QuakeNet article. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||
 |
This page was nominated for deletion on 1 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
A was never actually used on QuakeNet I'm afraid, also ElectionServ wasn't ever a 'service', it was just a client I ran on my home network with a single letter nick. Z did the version scanning, V just removed drones. slug -- QuakeNet oper.
if you going to remove 1 legit site you had better remove them all str33tshen -- very upset -- co-owner of ufc-pride.org
I don't know about anyone else, but i wouldn't categorize QuakeNet as stable in terms of servers splitting often ("It became popular initially because of its network stability "). --BC 21:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
You wouldn't therefore categorise ANY irc network as stable due to the nature of the IRC protocol(s) and more importantly the nature of The Internet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.89.7 (talk) 21:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Real content please?
There's plenty out there: http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=quakenet+irc&hl=en&sa=N&start=10 - Save the lists of bots for your own sites. Such spammy and unprofessional listcruft has no business here. MrZaiustalk 16:00, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
