Talk:Rugeley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject UK geography (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Cities (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

According to Rugeley Online, the 2001 population was approx. 23,000 - I find it hard to believe it has grown to 40,000 in less than 5 years, as a previous edit claimed. — sjorford (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I've reverted again - please give a source for the 40,000 figure! See this page from Rugeley Online - the total of 22,950 given there includes Brereton and Etchinghill wards (Hagley and Western Springs form the bulk of the town). (I note that if you include Brereton and Etchinghill twice, you get close to 40,000, which may be where this figure has come from.) — sjorford++ 10:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Check out the Cannock Chase official website (of which Rugeley is part of and mentions Rugeley's population) this is where it was stated of 40,000 apx. I was stating what was written there. To be fair an household is usually worked out at 2.4 so by taking that into account has a basis it could be worked out by working out how many streets there are and how many houses per street with four per household (Has some families have less and some have far more this is only a rough guess at the population) although of late there has been a population boom in Rugeley which accounts for a jump. I am not disagreeing the the census just was adding what the Cannock Chase website had on there.

Can you post a direct link to the page you found it on? — sjorford++ 13:04, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

The page i was actually looking for I cannot find, not sure if it was has been moved or not, but did find this one. Hope it helps

http://www.expressandstar.com/es/features/community/townguides/rugeley.shtml


[edit] Phone Code

A large number of websites contain an incorrect spelling duplicating an error present in Ofcom's (previously Oftel) UK area code list for the last decade. 01889 was listed as Rugely in the official UK area code list and only recently corrected to Rugeley, see their Errata. 212.139.105.91 (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export