Talk:Solidarity (UK)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom (Rated C-class)

Politics portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

C This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-Class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Accessibility: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> \| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> \| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> \| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:

	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Todo list:

^{edit · history · watch · purge}

Here are some tasks you can do:

Cleanup:

Cleanup articles recorded in our Cleanup listing
Expand: Urgently need to include new content from Labour in office 1997-2010, and Labour afterwards under new leader Ed Miliband.
Infobox:

Identify pages that need infoboxes by adding |needs-infobox=yes to the project banner.

Add infoboxes to any articles appearing in this category.
Stubs:

Expand any of our stub articles.
Verify:

Add sources to Unreferenced BLPs
Other:

Check this category for any articles requiring urgent attention.

Add {{WP UK Politics}} to all talk pages within the project scope.

Assess the quality of all our unassessed articles

Identify pages that need images by adding |needs-picture=yes to the project banner.

Find images for any articles listed in this category.

Note: only free images are allowed for living people unless an argument can be made that their appearance has changed significantly since the time in which they were notable (see WP:NFC#Unacceptable use).

WikiProject Socialism

Socialism portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the socialist movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

‹ The template WikiProject Political parties has been deprecated. For details of how to replace it, please see Template:WikiProject Political parties.›

WikiProject Political parties

(Rated C-class, Low-importance)

Politics portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Political parties, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Political parties on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

C

This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Solidarity (UK) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.

January 29, 2005

Featured article candidate

Not promoted

[edit] old comments

This page is undergoing heavy first drafting at the moment. Other contributors are solicited and welcome. I will be integrating material from the IISH (www.iigs.nl) shortly which will add to material on the formation and splitting of Solidarity. Also some anecdotes. Will improve the structure too. Fifelfoo 04:20, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I hope you do, As a holding entry it passes for now but it's not really NPOV is it? Far too much of a puff piece I'm afraid. Mind Solidarity weren't bad in their day.

Jock Haston Oct 23 2004

Dear Jock,

Nope, its nowhere near NPOV. I'd invite some ancient Healyites over to give their perspective on the formation, but I don't know any (and doubt they'd be open to the idea of an NPOV entry on a split). One of the problems is finding genuinely critical material on them, because they weren't bad in their day. An angle through Soc ou Bar's membership's decent into pomo doesn't fit--because Soli avoided that decent. Classlessness maybe, but their half-and-half class and order-giver order-taker thing pretty much resembles class. If you've got a contribution, even if its just a spiel, I'll edit it in. Handy hint for talk pages, four tildes in a row ie, ~ gives an automatic name / date thingie ie: Fifelfoo 22:54, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Was this the same group that used to publish the 'Journal of Libertarian Socialism in the 1960s?

Talk:Solidarity (UK)

[edit] old comments

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

Interaction

Toolbox

Print/export