Talk:Splenectomy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Medicine (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that this article follows the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Shouldn't this text be a subheading under spleen until it becomes more complete? Alex.tan 15:21, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I'm not sure. It's beyond stub level and having it separate might encourage people to edit it more than they would if it was already part of a longer article. On the other hand, having it as part of spleen does make that article better. Whatever is done to this should probably be done to Tonsillectomy as well. Angela. 02:43, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC)
I don't think so. After all, tonsillectomy is larger than tonsils. 71.103.38.192 06:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References in popular culture

In science-fiction comic spoofs (brewster rockit for one, at least) a character yells, "Aaaah! My spleen!" when gutted by aliens. Should this be included in the article? 71.103.38.192 06:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

No. JFW | T@lk 07:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Complications

doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.02.014 - Am J Med review. JFW | T@lk 07:57, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Effect of splenectomy on diabetes risk

I removed the doubt tag on the above, but reworded the doubted text to clearly indicate that this is very much a case of scientific conjecture. The reference NY Times article has the following text:

The findings raised the question of what happens to people who have their spleens removed. Dr. Faustman went to the medical literature and discovered that most spleens were removed in emergency rooms and that few patients were followed afterward, with two exceptions.
One was a group of patients in England with pancreatitis. To treat them, doctors had removed half of the pancreas. When they removed the right half of the organ, the patients were fine. But when they removed the left half, along with the attached spleen, patients often developed diabetes about five years later.
The other case involved children with beta thalassemia, a genetic disease involving iron storage. Often, they developed enlarged spleens, which were removed. Five years or so later, many got diabetes.

The article clearly makes reference to a perceived relationship between splenectomy and elevated diabetes risk. This does not imply, of course, that said relationship in fact exists.

Bigdumbdinosaur (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export