 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
 Start |
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| Top |
This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
This article has comments here.
|
|
|
[edit] Spelling of title
The film is at Super Fly (film). I noticed the spelling here was different, and moved it accordingly, but I suspect they should be the same. I would have written it as one word, despite the layout on the promo. Anyway, I think we should be consistent. - Jmabel | Talk 17:57, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
I think the two-word layout on the poster is just a style thing. The spine of the soundtrack CD as well as every mention of the title in the track listing and the liner notes are all single-word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.118.211 (talk) 03:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] 2004 rolling stone review
Good job Dan56 for cleaning up this article. I've always wanted to tackle it but..I got lazy. :) I removed the 2004 rolling stone review for this article. Only because it was a bit mis-leading. We'd need a page number for that cite to make it anything useful and it made it not clear which review (the original one, or the 2004 one) actually gave the five star rating. To make it more clear later, perhaps in the reception section something about that 5 star review should be added to that section. What does anyone else think? Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for incorporating the album review into the article, but that was only half the point. With that extra review, that makes 11 reviews in the infobox. That's a bit too many. Also, with that five stars it wasn't clear which review (the 2000's one or the 1970s one) is the 5 star review. The average reader of the article wouldn't know which is which. To make it clear, I've removed the 2004 link from the infobox. I hope there aren't any objections here! Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
