Talk:Tailpiece

I think the page flows a bit better with fewer headers; everything on a tailpiece is pretty closely related to everything else. Fine tuners may be an attachment, or they may integrated, not only on trade-fiddle level TP's (e.g. Wittner, Thomastik and their clones) but some more pricey ones (e.g. Pusch and Bois d'Harmonie.) For that matter, the tailgut may also be considered an attachment (as in "sold separately.") Where to put it all? All together, sez I.

Material and construction very much plays into mass distribution, hence tone... it's all of a piece. OK, I'll be quiet for a while now :-) Just plain Bill 22:34, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Layout & hdgs

OK what we have now looks OK to me!--Light current 23:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

"acoustic basses"

double basses ARE members of the violin family. Bottesini 00:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Technically speaking, double basses are derived from the viol family, which is slightly different from the branch that the violin, viola, and cello come from. J Lorraine 09:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

banjo use

not much mention of how the tailpiece on a banjo works. i'm not going to try and put it into words, but i think it could be helpful. Marge4 01:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Proposal for expansion

Nice article with good illustrations, but the scope is extremely limited and only includes acoustic instruments in the violin family. I propose expanding to include other instrument families worldwide, including acoustic and electric, or rename to 'Tailpiece (violin)'. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 04:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Be bold and include what you think is appropriate. If the article gets too bulky (unlikely) or disjointed, the violin stuff can be split out separately into something like 'Tailpiece (violin)' or such, but that bridge (pun intended) doesn't need crossing just yet. __Just plain Bill (talk) 11:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)