Talk:Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Japan / History (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 02:15, February 1, 2012 (JST, Heisei 24)
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the History task force.
 
WikiProject Korea (Rated Start-class, High-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
 Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Korean history working group.

[edit] What??

This section makes no sense at all. Looks like it was translated by a computer:

Two is made from English, Japanese, and Korean (Korean language), and the agreement is being kept respectively by the two countries. It is known that there was US's initiation behind this negotiation since about July, 1951, and South Korea cannot become the country concerned of Peace Treaty signed in San Francisco, the president Syngman Rhee at that time hopes for direct talks with Japan, and there is details from which the conference (Preparatory talks : on October 20, 1951) is begun in diplomatic director of a bureau's Siebold attendance in highest command (SCAP) in Tokyo in Allied Forces.

Didn't want to remove it because it might be important...if one could understand it. PhnxFyreG (talk) 05:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Many sources missing

Almost all sources for the final section on compensation are missing. This should be fixed as soon as possible, as the claims made are quite important, and relatively difficult to verify online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niyab (talkcontribs) 13:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export