Talk:Trespass (album)
| WikiProject Albums | (Rated Start-class) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Progressive Rock | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Contents |
[edit] Dead link
the link under 'external links' does not lead to anything anymore. Should it be removed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.85.4.117 (talk) 11:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Mellotron
i could be wrong but i dont think that tony banks had a mellotron at the time of trespass. im pretty sure the first recording with a mellotron was the fountain of samalcis.
- Well you are half-wrong: he didn't own his own mellotron at the time, no. But they recorded the album in a studio, and believe it or not, most studios actually have their own equipment which you can use when you're in there ;-) Moreover you can quite clearly hear mellotron on the album (for example, at the start of "White Mountain").--feline1 22:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
-
- That is correct. Mellotron is also used on Visions of Angels and Stagnation: http://www.planetmellotron.com/revgenesis.htm MarkRae (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Critical success
We turn again to Rolling Stone magazine and his review on Tresspass, wich basicly follows the basics of describing a little bit of the album, sometimes the cover and then meddle that with phrases such as "at momments its just plain boring" along with its final word about the album "only for hardcore fans of genesis, otherwize its just not worth it". Of course, i read the review a long time ago, and i believe it can be found in its webpage so im basicly para-phrasing here, but it was something very along those lines. Trespass didnt necesarely had a critical success, though its deffinatelly a fine album and one of Genesis's best.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Trespass70.jpg
Image:Trespass70.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Professional Review suggestion
As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this article about Trespass. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the piece and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the professional reviews section. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (favorable) [1]
Mike harkin (talk) 19:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Chart Position
I don't have a copy anymore, but according to "British Hit Albums", Trespass did not chart at all in the UK until it was reissued in 1984 after Virgin bought out Charisma Records. That was when it hit #98. Foxtrot was the first album to actually chart in the UK when originally released. --Ritchie333 (talk) 15:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Opinion vs facts
Can wiki authors give opinions like:
"The drum playing is generally fairly soft, which actually complements the atmosphere"
with no references?
I just want to gauge what can and cannot be put onto wiki pages.