|
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
C |
This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. |
|
|
|
| ??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
This article has comments here.
|
| Food and Drink task list: |
|
This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.
|
Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
- Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Food, Bread, Beef, Curry, Drink, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt, Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom)
- Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: , Italian cuisine, Cuisine of the Thirteen Colonies, Coffee, Milk, Pasta, French cuisine
- Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Burger King
- Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
- Get rid of Trivia sections in articles you are working on.
- Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner to food and drink related articles to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, click here.
- Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of food
|
|
|
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. |
|
B |
This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. |
| High |
This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
edit · history · watch · refresh To-do list for Vitamin C: |
|

|
Here are some tasks you can do:
- Cleanup:
- the references, adding any requested citations and using {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}}, {{cite book}} or {{cite news}} wherever possible
"ascorbic acid" should only be referred to when specifically discussing that chemical, otherwise use "vitamin C" or "ascorbate" I think this has been done already. --SV Resolution(Talk) 20:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- ensure information is not being repeated
"Further reading" is all about fringe subjects megavitamin dosing and autism addressed -- not TOTALLY about megavitamin dosing any longer. --SV Resolution(Talk) 20:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- Copyedit:
the section order relating to its content
- Expand: vitamin C has major industrial application in the formulation of personal care products and dermatological medicaments. Hundreds of these are on the market, and the underlying principles are the subject of numerous patents and a large body of scientific research in USA, Japan, and the EU. These aspects virtually unrecognized in the article.-Contrablue (talk) 21:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- NPOV: please try to ignore personal bias and focus intently on maintaining neutrality between the views of megadosers and non-megadosers
- Wikify:
fix red links! either create the article from what information you can gather, or, as a last resort, remove the link --SV Resolution(Talk) 13:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- Other:
consider splitting any large sections to their own article
- keep article size down (without sacrificing any vital info)
- remove "see also" section - should be incorporated into the article proper
See for further recommendations for improvement the comments made on the wikiproject notices (which wikiproject notices?)
|
|
| Priority 1 (top) |
[edit] Should we renominate this for featured article?
I've been looking over this article, and its pretty comprehensive, well sourced and attractive. Should we try again for FA? It's been three years now since it failed! Must've changed loads. I think there could be some reference cleanup and there are a few loose {{fact}} tags, but apart from that I can't see any other major reasons why it would fail... If anyone sees any, could you outline them here and I'll help fix them and we can try again for FA. Woop! Jack · talk · 21:56, Monday, 19 February 2007
- I've nominated this for a GA review, a crucial step the way - Jack · talk · 05:23, Wednesday, 21 February 2007
[edit] Kakadu Plum
Is there any sources for the vitamin C content of this? Neither this page, nor the Terminalia ferdinandiana page list sources. If there are no sources, surely it should be removed? Heywoodg (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Brand Miller, J., James, K. W. and Maggiore, P. M. A. 1993. Tables of composition of Australian aboriginal foods, Canberra, A.C.T: Aboriginal Studies Press. VertebralTomb (talk) 19:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit] "Volunteers"?
Whny the scare quotes on the Iowa State Penitentiary volunteers for scurvy studies? --Yaush (talk) 22:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Because imprisoned people who may get out early, or some special favor which only restores what everybody else has, are not really volunteers in the true sense of the word. They are under heavy duress. That is why using prisoners as medical subjects has generally been outlawed-- they can't really give free consent. If you consider the idea of female prisoners volunteering to have sex with their guards, you'll see the point. SBHarris 02:27, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
-
- This rationale for the scare quotes seems to me to violate WP:NPOV. If removing the scare quotes is also thought to take sides on a controversy unrelated to Vitamin C, I suggest we drop the word "volunteers" completely. I'm going to go ahead and make that change. --Yaush (talk) 14:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Vitamin C effect on colds in cold-excercise
A preventive effect of vitamin C on colds has been seen in five separate prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled human trials of low temperature exercise. Here are three: [1]. Also the meta analysis of this data combined is strongly positive. This is not "cherry picking" data, as each of the separate trials were designed to answer this specific question, so there is no post-hoc data selection of data that was never meant to be used in this fashion. Nor are there negative trials which have been overlooked by Cochrane. (If you think so, find them). In such cases, a meta analysis strengthens a conclusion, not weakens it. Nor is Cochrane Review known for its credulous data manipulation! As I said in the summary, if you won't believe in gold standard data of this type, what sort of data WILL you believe? I've restored the statements, which are fully justified. SBHarris 00:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
[edit] oxidative quackery
My understanding of this is that 'oxidative stress' is a somewhat controversial topic, and not everyone is in agreement about it as a genuine issue for biological systems. Vitamin C has become associated with this nonsense since it is a reducing agent. And I do know what that term means.
Vitamin C seems to be viewed as a sort of 'cure all' these days when it's principal role is very clearly to act as a cofactor in collagen synthesis. This seems to be buried in the middle of all of this drivel when it is the most important thing by far that Vitamin C is involved in. A fact that is surely clear to anyone who knows what scurvy is.
This article and indeed this discussion page are far far far too long! Perhaps someone would like to sprinkle some vitamin C on it and reduce it (lol)! Johnpretty010 (talk) 00:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- This is a very poor summary of the functions of vitamin C. Ascorbic acid has a wide number of biological functions, and only some are known. While the term 'oxidative stress' might be debated because it is often improperly used, it is clear that it is an issue for biological systems and has serious health effects. The role of vitamin C is still being elucidated. VertebralTomb (talk) 19:31, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
[edit] Vitamin C Absorption
The section on vitamin C absorption is in accurate. The absorption study referenced did not measure doses above 1.25 g. VertebralTomb (talk) 19:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- I fixed the relevant text. The reference to the absorption of 12+ g was removed, as there was no reference listed for that data.VertebralTomb (talk) 16:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)