Talk:+1 (film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
 

Text found at Talk:Doppelgänger[edit]

Talk:Doppelgänger#I_added_back_.22tradition_of_the_Talmud.2C_to_meet_oneself_means_to_meet_God..22_with_fact_tag

==I added back "tradition of the Talmud, to meet oneself means to meet God." with fact tag==

Dialogue from the movie plus one +1 (film):

"Maybe we don't have less to worry about then we think"
"What do you mean"
"If the universe is really infinite - it means mathematically there must be replicas of our solar system, out there"
"You've gotta be kidding me."
"Look just because they exist [doubles of ourselves] doesn't mean they are out to get us"
"She's right..."
"Yeah, and how do you figure?"
"From the book of Talmud, to meet ones self is to meet God."

I did a Google search:

Talmud, to meet ones self is to meet God

...and found a reference to an old August 2011 quote from an old version of this Wikipedia article:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/020221.html
" In some myths, the doppelgänger is a version of the Ankou, a personification of death; in a tradition of the Talmud, to meet oneself means to meet God."

I added back "tradition of the Talmud, to meet oneself means to meet God." with fact tag to the Doppelgänger article.

Can anyone help me reference this reference in the Talmud which can be added to +1 (film) and Doppelgänger? Of course, I will look more myself too.

Wikia6969 (talk) 09:37, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia SPOILERS[edit]

Why does wikipedia keep revealing movie spoilers in the plot section of most movies? I don't get it? Do other movie and normal encyclopedias do this too?--74.57.167.219 (talk) 00:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia describes the full plot. As such, it doesn't censor spoilers. How could you describe the ending of a film without spoilers? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
By leaving something to the fucking imagination. Fucking stupid people "Here, let's just ocmpletely ruin the entire fucking movie for everyone who comes here to find out what it's about." (Personal attack removed)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.86.14.225 (talk) 14:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
OK, well, maybe you shouldn't read the plot section if you don't want to see spoilers. As WP:SPOILER says, the plot section is already labeled for spoilers by virtue of its heading. This is why we don't use spoiler warnings. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2015 (UTC)