Talk:100000 (number)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This needs to be moved back to 100000 (number) for consistency with other articles on integer > 999. This issue was already voted on a couple of years ago and the commaless format was agreed on. PrimeFan 22:31, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

  • Agree. That seems easier and makes more sense than moving all other number articles. Kusma (talk) 01:16, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
Agree. There should be an official policy about that. I will move it right now. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:18, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

107777: the smallest number requiring 16 syllables in English?[edit]

This article claims that 107777 is the smallest number requiring 16 syllables in English. What about 77777? Ok I may be wrong but please bear with me: se-ven-ty-se-ven-thou-sand-se-ven-hun-dred-se-ven-ty-se-ven... Where's my (probably stupid) mistake? — Hillel 04:18, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

  • And by the way, even if it was, it would not be the smallest number but the smallest natural number requiring 16 syllables in English... I'm gonna change that but my original question still stands. And I'm gonna add one: are these syllables count properties worth mentioning at all? — Hillel 04:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
You're definitely right that it should be "smallest natural number." As for syllable counts, it needs to be clarified which dialect of English is being used. That these numbers are listed in (sequence A002810 in OEIS) and OEISA045736 is an argument that they're worthy of mention here. A counter-argument would be that neither sequence has the "core" keyword. PrimeFan 21:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
I've removed it, as OEIS lists 77777. 75.118.170.35 (talk) 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Huh?[edit]

...following 99999 and preceding 100001.
Citation needed? CartoonistHenning (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

117067 is not a prime number[edit]

all vampire numbers cannot be prime numbers. 117607 is divisible by 167 and 701. 175.139.46.122 (talk) 08:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

You wrote 117607 the second time but correctly 117067 in the heading. The entry said:
117067 is a prime vampire number as that concept is defined in the linked article at vampire number#Variants. However, I can understand a reader can get confused. I have changed the link formatting of the entry to:
This hints that "prime vampire number" may be a whole concept and not just a vampire number which is prime (impossible as you say). PrimeHunter (talk) 13:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

apakah kau mencintaiku??[edit]

nhxjbdeuasx  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.250.30.115 (talk) 02:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)