Talk:1991

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Years (Rated List-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 List  This article has been rated as List-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Page layout years[edit]

There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout.

For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).

Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.

Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). talk--BozMo 13:44, 7 May 2004 (UTC)

On April 14 you have the same event listed twice. You should delete one. But which one to keep? I added the first performance of smells like teen spirit and the release of nevermind by Nirvana HOD 09:59, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Generation for the year[edit]

Should we include the generation for the year, and if we should which generation was it? Generation Y or the internet generation? Mrmattkatt 20:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC) Note: Question is still not answered Mrmattkatt 02:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

June 3rd[edit]

Joe McEvoy is listed as "the sexiest person ever" next to births on the second half (June-December), and there's no link for him, i searched him and he has no article, the June next to his name isn't even a link to "june". Most likley another prank, i went to remove him with edit and it wasnt listed on the page. Then i went to edit the page and it didnt show there either. Can a staff member remove him or is he stuck on the page? --User King of Ba Shu —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.90.240.50 (talk) 14:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC).

WTF[edit]

Who is these shitheads who add that useless trash in the birth section? An administrator needs to have them blocked permanently. Anyway, lets discuss about what we should do while an admin tries blocking that shithead permanently. User:Factual80man

You must be new here. There's a permanent tide of people adding vanity to these articles. You don't block them unless they keep doing it after being told not to. Average Earthman 13:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Still, no one here wants this encyclopedia screwed by that dickhead. Also I'm not new here. I've been here for a while. As in honest about what I want for my birthday (in 2 days), have that dickhead blocked. User:Factual80man
Ultimately vanity and simple vandalism have little to no impact in the long run; deleting it is just part of the daily routine, nothing to get too worked up over. --TM 14:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
My Birthday is tomorrow. I want to get what I want as my birthday not a disgrace made by some internet hacking bitches. User:Factual80man

Mining accident[edit]

Jan 9 and Jun 9 seem to have the same event. Robin Patterson 06:18, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Electric Company[edit]

This was a recently added event for April 15, a TV show ended, I've added a wikilink but I'm not sure if it's notable enough to keep. Any thoughts? It has its own wikipedia article, but that doesn't always make it notable. JoeyETS 01:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Table Of Contents[edit]

I'm kinda new here but shouldn't the TOC be at the top. I don't really know how to fix it --Fukhed666 00:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Closest palindromic years?[edit]

Are 1991 and 2002 really the closest palindromic years? What about, for example, years 2 and 3? Or years 22 and 33? Jamie|C 14:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

You are correct; I just came to the talk for this article just to mention that (999 and 1000 make good close examples as well). Eouw0o83hf 13:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

1000 is not a palindromic year, surely! I think you mean 1001?

File:Margot Fonteyn.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Image-x-generic.svg An image used in this article, File:Margot Fonteyn.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Superbowl[edit]

Should the Superbowl be included for this year? Centralized discussion at WT:YEARS#SuperbowlsArthur Rubin (talk) 17:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Deaths[edit]

Shouldn't there be a separate page for the deaths, so like "Deaths in 1991"?--Mjs1991 (talk) 11:19, 24 June 2012 (UTC)