Talk:1998 Pacific hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured article1998 Pacific hurricane season is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic star1998 Pacific hurricane season is the main article in the 1998 Pacific hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 11, 2013.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 18, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
May 7, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
July 4, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
February 12, 2010Featured topic removal candidateKept
Current status: Featured article

Untitled[edit]

This article needs more info. juan andrés 04:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agatha[edit]

An interesting error on Agatha. The NHC track map (in the infobox) and at the NHC's archive both state Agatha was a hurricane (its type H not TS). However the TCR is for a 55kt TS and the track map itself shows that it never became a hurricane...--Nilfanion (talk) 22:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting indeed. Maybe they initially planned on upgrading Agatha to hurricane status in post-analysis? I dunno, but they are only humans. I suppose they're free to make mistakes once in a while. --Hurricanehink (talk) 22:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Its just a very simple typo by whoever made the track map up (they put a H in instead of T). The track map itself shows that Agatha was a TS. I corrected the commons map.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, T and H aren't that easy to mistake. Thanks for correcting it. --Hurricanehink (talk) 23:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It says Hurricane Agatha here too [1]. It mentions 55 knots as well. I guess they said that because it had an eye. Good kitty 00:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 11:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 11:40, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Todo[edit]

I don't think this is in danger of FAR, but I'd like to see a seasonal summary section added as well as the removal of some overlinking. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1998 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Javier[edit]

In an abandoned sandbox I have discovered sometime ago, there is a bit of a information about Javier's damage and deaths. Apparently, Javier caused 162 deaths and $1.5 billion. At least 162 people were killed by flash flooding and mudslides caused by Javier.[1][2] Unofficial reports indicate that upwards of 1,000 people were killed by the storm, making Javier one of the deadliest tropical cyclones to form in the basin.[1][3] At least 450,000 people were left homeless and damages from the storm amounted to $1.5 billion.[1] @Cyclonebiskit: Should I add this information to the main article? I'm not sure if this is reliable. SMB99thx my edits! 04:36, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ a b c Staff Writer (September 23, 1998). "Political Parties Seek to Postpone October Elections in Chiapas Because of Severe Storm Damage". Latin American Data Base/Latin American Institute. Retrieved July 24, 2009.
  2. ^ Staff Writer (September 11, 1998). "Earthweek: A Diary of the Planet". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved July 24, 2009.
  3. ^ Servicio Meteorológico Nacional (1998). "Tormenta Tropical "Javier" del Océano Pacífico" (in Spanish). Retrieved 2007-02-13.
I don't believe those rains and floods were directly caused by Javier. The Weather Prediction Center links the heaviest rainfall to Tropical Storm Frances, over 40" in Chiapas, and CNN/Reuters confirms that the deadly floods occurred in Chiapas. Javier mostly caused rains on the west coast. If anything, I'd suggest a dedicated September 1998 Mexico floods article. For now, the content is in the Frances article, although some of it is unsourced. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]