Talk:1999 National League Championship Series

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This article is incredibly biased in favor of the NY Mets. Who gives a shit about what Chipper Jones said? And why is John Rocker referred to as a 'hothead?'

It needs a MAJOR edit job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.170.223.149 (talk) 07:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was Don't merge.--Mike Selinker (talk) 16:37, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Formal request has been received to merge Grand Slam Single into 1999 National League Championship Series. The term is used to describe one single play in that series. That is it. 69.118.34.185 (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment – It is indeed a single play but an exceptional one due to the extreme rarity of the event, so I don't think that alone would justify a merge. My initial thought is that some of the content in Grand Slam Single (particularly the "Other instances" section) would not belong in the 1999 NLCS article, so where would that go? In Grand slam (baseball) perhaps? Jameboy (talk) 14:28, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The play has gotten attention by itself in numerous reliable sources, and thus passes WP:GNG independently of the NLCS. Also, as others have pointed out, the "Other instances" is reliably sourced and not appropriate for a merge. See [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], and others a quick Google search reveals. I'm sure a more in-depth news search would reveal even more. Smartyllama (talk) 19:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.