Talk:2,5-Dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chemicals (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Psychedelics, Dissociatives and Deliriants  
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychedelics, Dissociatives and Deliriants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of hallucinogens on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Unsourced advice[edit]

I chopped the following, because it is unsourced and attempts to give advice to potential users. WP shouldn't be giving advice, and any advice that WP quotes needs to be sourced. This is doubly true of medical/safety advice.

Upon tasting the chemical, if one notices a highly bitter or "chemically" taste, this should serve as a warning sign that the drug is not LSD, but likely a psychedelic amphetamine (DOC, DOB or DOI). Although it must be noted that the absence of a bitter taste does not necessarily mean the blotter contains LSD, detecting other blotter substrate drugs like 5-MeO-AMT or Bromo-DragonFLY, by taste, has not yet been reported. An active dose of LSD (~100 μg) is so small that it has virtually no perceivable taste[citation needed].

Ashmoo (talk) 12:43, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I agree with the above and I am tempted to simply cut out the advice.

The taste of something bitter on blotter won't also necessarily ensure that you *DO* have something other than LSD. It might, but it's not a very reliable test. It could mean that you have LSD in addition to another compound and just because that compound is better doesn't necessarily mean much. Furthermore, where is the evidence that DOB, DOC, DOI, etc. are bitter?

Perhaps the only reliable way to detect whether or not one likely has LSD (and I can offer a source for this) is to expose the sample to a blacklight in the dark. Lysergic acid and derivatives (so long as it has the pi system) will fluoresce blue. Hence, blue fluorescence indicates that one at least has a compound with the lysergic acid moiety.AlkaloidMan (talk) 04:25, 29 October 2010 (UTC)AlkaloidMan

Chemical structure[edit]

The picture of structure is wrong. The picture implies a particular chirality that compound does not have. It needs to be depicted as the racemate! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.204.73.226 (talkcontribs) 17 February 2011‎

Hopefully I just addressed that. Catclock (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The picture is still wrong... structure is 2,5 methoxy.. picture shows 3,6 methoxy