Talk:2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Chemicals (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Psychedelics, Dissociatives and Deliriants (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychedelics, Dissociatives and Deliriants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of hallucinogens on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

Lets talk...[edit]

why not move title from 2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine to DOI (psychedelic)? much simpler title really —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Use the force (talkcontribs) 13:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

Because WP articles should have correct titles, and not necessary simple ones. But your recommendation is also implemented in DOI. WP can its cake AND you can have it too :-). Wim van Dorst (talk) 21:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC).
The common explanation that these molecules (manifestagens/entheogens/psychedelics/empathogens) act as agonists or antagonists of the endogenous neuro-pathways is completely impotent at determining the cause of their specific effects and the specifics of what effects they cause... and who's cause they effect? This (mis?)conceptualization of their function and utility simply does not explain the activity of these molecules in any more than a rudimentary way. Whoever figures this out probably wins a lot, but its not me because I am a poor slave of the lowest industrial class just above toxic waste cast into our oceans. I WILL INFORMATION FUCK YOU. (Molecule speaking. I didn't take any yet but there is no cause for lack of effect when causality is taken out of effect...)
A more potent conclusion, based on actual research -assuming it was done before the passing of THE IDIOT ACT of 1972 and its ANTI-BRAIN AMENDMENT, would conclude activity and utility (as consciousness expanding substances to start off) that would then cause the understanding of the fractal-geometry of their meta-structure... Leading to potentially limitless insights. Furthermore would derive from the comparison of the molecular progressions of the internal metabolic pathways (B12->T->5-HT). Is it so difficult to see that the extended metabolic pathway of an evolved neurochemical set would be structured for further augmentation? Am I having illegal thoughts again? I guess we just better stay dumb and hope that our overlords are merciful... When will the humans wake up?18:39, 5 February 2009 69.230.17.97 (talk)

Tone[edit]

The tone of this article sounds like a commercial for users. Ridiculous.Freakdog (talk) 01:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Chembox vs. Drugbox[edit]

Hi, people, I think that a drugbox might be more appropriate for this page than the chembox. What do you think? Fuse809 (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2014 (UTC)