Talk:2000 Football League Second Division play-off final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured article2000 Football League Second Division play-off final is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 14, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
August 21, 2008Good article nomineeListed
May 9, 2021Featured article candidatePromoted
September 19, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
January 24, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Featured article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 Football League Second Division playoff final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Any comments are welcome. LegoKontribsTalkM 23:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Currently On Hold Pass

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Could we have a link to the game's official site, or if it doesn't have one the leagues official site webpage on that?
    • No official site for the game exists, I will add a link to The Football League's official website, that's the best I can manage
Looks good
  1. B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Only covers the match and previous matches. Can it cover anything else like: sponsors reactions, revenue, fans?
    • Revenue for individual matches is not normally published in the UK, nor do sponsors generally publicly announce their reactions. The fans are covered by the mention of how many were present and the huge disparity in the number supporting each team, not sure what else there is to say beyond that.........
      • Found a bit about revenue and added that in
Fine
  1. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Seems fine.
  2. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    History looks clear
  3. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    A logo of the match, or the playoffs is needed. Example
    • Neither the playoffs in general, nor the final specifically, has its own logo, so there is nothing which would be appropriate to add here
  1. B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    The picture of Darren Sheridan doesn't make sense, and if it stays there, it needs a new caption.
    • Sorry, but I don't understand why it "doesn't make sense". The player in question was involved in a pivotal moment in the match, which is covered in the paragraph which the image appears alongside, and is mentioned in the caption, please elaborate on why this "doesn't make sense".....
      • Re-worded the caption, don't know if it helps at all.........
I was thinking more of a picture of the him commiting penalty, or him while playing the game, but it is better.
  1. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Need to fix 2A, 3B, 6A, 6B. LegoKontribsTalkM 23:35, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing my article -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could You put in a "See Also" section with links to the 2 team's articles, and leagues articles. LegoKontribsTalkM 21:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done that, hope it looks OK - ChrisTheDude (talk) 05:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I was wrong about that, but Peanut4 , already reverted. Congratulations, I will now pass it. LegoKontribsTalkM 03:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page move[edit]

With the consent of the main contributor (ChrisTheDude), and per both this consensus and the article's sources, I have moved the page from 2000 Football League Second Division playoff final to 2000 Football League Second Division play-off final (addition of hyphen). --Jameboy (talk) 11:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Top scorers[edit]

Queries[edit]

@The Rambling Man: That's what the programme says - I have it in front of me now. I can take and upload a quick picture if it helps..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't doubt it. I'm just wondering who he really was...! The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 08:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Here's his obit, which mentions his "brief" spell as League chairman -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:42, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
He sounds like a character! I wonder if he should be added to the Football League article in that case. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 08:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]