Talk:2001 anthrax attacks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject United States / District of Columbia / FBI / Government (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject FBI (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject U.S. Congress (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
This article is about one (or many) Event(s).
WikiProject Terrorism (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated B-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3
Archive 4 Archive 5
Threads older than 30 days may be archived by MiszaBot I.

Contents


[edit] Dead link 6

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Dead link 7

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Dead link 8

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Dead link 9

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:59, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Dead link 10

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 14:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] Neutrality tags

So, if I understand this correctly, presenting evidence from the FBI report is against neutrality? Since they are one of the "sides" in this, NOT including their side would NOT be neutral. Think of it like this, imagine this article were about abortion and the FBI represents pro-choice. Without including their side, you've got an article about why abortion is wrong (which isn't what Wikipedia is supposed to do.)

To sum up, you may disagree with the FBI report, that's okay. Questioning its place in making this article neutral is not, since without it there can be no neutrality. Anynobody(?) 17:19, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export