Talk:2004 Australian Embassy bombing in Jakarta

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Australia / Politics (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon 2004 Australian Embassy bombing in Jakarta is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.
 
Note icon
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia.
WikiProject Indonesia (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Terrorism (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Suggestion[edit]

Any further reversions or problems - rather than edit summaries - should be here under the guidelines of what the talk page header is asking of all editors SatuSuro 23:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Recent reversions[edit]

Please take the effort to provide explanations for category or article changes here as some revsersions have been made with no explanation (or citations to back them up) thank you SatuSuro 06:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Please read the articles, the references and stop wikistalking.Prester John 06:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Damage reports[edit]

The introduction to this article states, "Damage to the nearby Chinese embassy was also reported", without mentioning any source. The Chinese embassy is a good couple of kilometers away and in any case is screened by intervening buildings. There was however damage to the Russian embassy, but I do not have any news reports of this, and my info comes from my own eyesight, which presumably counts as original research. If nobody objects, I will remove the reference to the Chinese embassy in the next day or so. Davidelit 05:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Go for it - a small article of reliably referenced info is always better than a long list of unreferenced bs. We must go for quality before quantity anytime. :) --Merbabu 05:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Reactions[edit]

We've included the Australian opposition leader's reaction but nothing from Indonesia's president at the time? It did occur in Indonesia after all.--Jeff79 (talk) 06:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Azahari Husin.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Azahari Husin.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --11:13, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Adding "Jakarta" to title?[edit]

Anyone object to adding "in Jakarta" to the title? This would keep the title parallel with most other embassy attack articles: List of attacks on diplomatic missions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:26, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Indonesian project hat on - to help understand context outside of the project - that seems fine - as long as you clean up as well - :) - SatuSuro 04:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
I objected to "Jakarta"'s substitution with the word "Australian", but the mover was not one known to listen to others. I like ""2004 Australian Jakarta embassy bombing" but "2004 Australian embassy bombing in Jakarta" seems to be the standard. cheers --Merbabu (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Adding a section on arrests and trial of suspects[edit]

I recently added some information on the arrest and trial of Rois, but I'm wondering if this needs its own section as currently it falls under the 'Investigation' heading. Thoughts? Glebesam (talk) 02:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 4[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 5[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:49, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 6[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 01:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)