Talk:2004 Chūetsu earthquake

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Earthquakes (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Earthquakes, a project to systematically present information on earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information), or join by visiting the project page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Japan / Geography & environment / History (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 23:51, July 21, 2014 (JST, Heisei 26) (Refresh)
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the Geography and environment task force.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the History task force.
 

Untitled[edit]

In "The Mid Niigata Prefecture Earthquake," I think "Central" is a better word than "Mid." Photojpn.org 09:55, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Agreed! But that line is a quote of the term the JMA selected. The Japanese Wikipedia article says, "気象庁命名の正式名称は平成16年(2004年)新潟県中越地震(英語:The Mid Niigata Prefecture Earthquake in 2004)。" It goes on to explain that in English, people use a different term. If it were my word, I'd advocate changing it — and please do feel free to change my writing! Fg2 10:21, Nov 7, 2004 (UTC)
OK well, if that's the official translation, then we can't do anything about it. I think most people will just call it the "Niigata earthquake" or "Chuetsu earthquake." Photojpn.org 20:47, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I agree again. Most people say "Kobe earthquake" and ignore the JMA term "Great Hanshin Earthquake" — the official English term places Osaka ("Han") first and Kobe ("Shin") second, and ignores Awaji. By damage, it probably should have been "Kobe-Awaji Earthquake."

I think it would have been nice if it included a table of the shindo scale.

The shindo scale is important to the article. The information is only a click away (shindo is a live link); do you feel it's important to include it in the article on this earthquake? My personal feeling is that it's best to keep the table in the shindo article rather than repeat it in each article on an earthquake (it saves space that way, and keeps the earthquake article focused on the particular quake). Fg2 07:59, 27 November 2006 (UTC)