Talk:2008 Monaco Grand Prix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Featured article 2008 Monaco Grand Prix is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 1, 2009.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Formula One (Rated FA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject European Microstates / Monaco  (Rated FA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Featured article FA  This article has been rated as FA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Monaco.
 

Fastest Lap[edit]

Why is there so much confusion among the fastest lap setter?? Why is it being changed between Räikkönen and Massa after the race? So who actually set it?? Gokul009 (talk) 15:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Raikkonen set the fastest lap on lap 74, at 1:16.689. One user seemed to think it was Massa on lap 76. Nobody agreed with that user, least of all the FIA. It seems to be resolved now. Bretonbanquet (talk) 15:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Importance[edit]

I've dropped the page to mid importance (see here), to conform with the Belgian one. Apterygial (talk) 10:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Is an F1 team singular or plural?[edit]

I've always treated an F1 team as a singular entity in the grammatical sense, and have copyedited other articles in the scope of the MII to reflect this, but is there actually a WP:F1-wide standard?--Midgrid(talk) 18:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Well, the standard is UK English, and isn't this UK English? I think our American friends have it plural. I think. Apterygial 23:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
I wasn't aware that "team is/team are" was a UK/US English thing. But I agree we should have a consistent approach - perhaps raise it at WP:F1? P.S. What is "MII"? (I'm sure it will be really obvious and I'll feel like a dill when I find out the answer). DH85868993 (talk) 02:59, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I thought it was an English thing... Maybe not. P.S. WP:MII. It's a project to get all 2008 article Featured or GAs. Apterygial 07:47, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Re:MII - of course. I feel like a dill :-) DH85868993 (talk) 15:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Corner names[edit]

Where the corners have actual names (as opposed to Turn 1, 2, 3 etc.), I would prefer them to be italicised, but it's not a big issue.--Midgrid(talk) 18:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

As would I. I raised the point at WT:F1 ages ago but the consensus was to leave as is. Apterygial 23:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I'll have to remember that whenever I'm editing race report articles! :) --Midgrid(talk) 12:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Sutil[edit]

The IP editor was right, the second ref given does state that Sutil would have been given a penalty if he had finished the race. I'm not defending the edit summary left, but the edit was legitimate. Mjroots (talk) 18:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

True. While I have little sympathy with the manner the opinion was expressed, it does appear it was done in good faith. However, I can't help but feel that even with the steward's word it is still conjecture. Apterygial 00:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Exapand[edit]

Expand the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by YohohoTheBest (talkcontribs) 16:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Make it simpler[edit]

You have to make it simpler — Preceding unsigned comment added by YohohoTheBest (talkcontribs) 16:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)