2010 FEI World Equestrian Games is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

United States: Kentucky Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).

Equine Low‑importance

	Horses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Para Event medals[edit]

Untitled[edit]

I am proposing that the Para Event beadles be moved in to a separate table as there are 11 para events and 16 non-para events.

[1] confirms that para dressage medals should be counted in the medal table Topcardi (talk) 23:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion the Para events should be moved to a separete table. As in all others sports and olympics the Para sports are always separeted from the other ones.--Italodal (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The difference in this case is that the FEI definitely say in their press releases that para-dressage medals should be included in the medal table. The Commonwealth Games has the same rules. Topcardi (talk) 22:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They would as it pads the medal standings for the traditional European teams >:-o I guess thanks to the Wiki Nazis anyone who wants to see the real medal count will have to use the back of an envelope.Sturmovik (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

Was this article written by Alltech? There is so much text about them and no word about the criticism from the riders against the organisation of the WEG! And all your "sources" are from the Alltech Company! For the para dressage the measurements of the dressage circle was wrong - as a blind contestant realised - and the providing for the horses were so bad that several contestants complained. After that debacle it has been considered unklikely that the WEG will ever be held again in the US. 178.83.80.45 (talk) 12:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)poppy[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 FEI World Equestrian Games. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090629011212/http://www.alltechfeigames.com/ to http://www.alltechfeigames.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]