Talk:2014 AFF Championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Teams Qualified[edit]

Rumored have stated that this 2014 AFF Suzuki Cup would lets all the ASEAN teams to participated. I dont whether is true or false but i dont think all ASEAN teams will participated on this tournament. It will still use the format of the qualification. The qualification round will have group of 5 ( Brunei,  Cambodia,  Laos,  Myanmar, and  East Timor). The top six teams are  Indonesia,  Malaysia,  Philippines,  Singapore (host),  Thailand, and  Vietnam (co-host).

Wester. Inc (talk) 08:37, 3 April 2013 (EST)

not qualification but go to aff suzuki cup 2014.

Example: Group stage

  1. Group 1 (Hanoi)

Thailand, Vietnam, Brunei Played: Day 1, Day 3 and Day 5

  1. Group 2 (Kallang)

Singapore, Laos, Timor Leste Played: Day 1, Day 3 and Day 5

  1. Group 3 (Ho Minh)

Australia, Myanmar, Malaysia Played: Day 2, Day 4 and Day 6

  1. Group 4 (Marina Bay)

Indonesia, Cambodia, Philippines Played: Day 2, Day 4 and Day 6

Quarter round

  1. R1 (Hanoi)

Win G1 vs Lose G3 Played: Day 10

  1. R2 (Kallang)

Win G2 vs Lose G4 Played: Day 11

  1. R3 (Ho Minh)

Lose G1 vs Win G3 Played: Day 12

  1. R4 (Marina Bay)

Lose G2 vs Win G4 Played: Day 13

Half round

  1. A1 (host of the win r1)

Win R1 vs Win R3 Played: Day 17

  1. A2 (host of the win r2)

Win R2 vs Win R4 Played: Day 18

  1. A1 (host of the win r3)

Win R3 vs Win R1 Played: Day 19

  1. A2 (host of the win r4)

Win R4 vs Win R2 Played: Day 20

Total aggerate A1 and A2

Final round

  1. F (host the win a1)

Win A1 vs Win A2 Played: Day 24

  1. F (host the win a2)

Win A2 vs Win A1 Played: Day 28

Total aggerate F

Win F => Winner 2014 AFF suzuki cup. Akuindo (talk) 04:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Sure If Australia would play on 2014 AFF Suzuki Cup. There is one article which i read that mention that Australia will not join the AFF Suzuki Cup competition. Wester. Inc (talk) 08:05, 27 August 2013 (EST)

Australia[edit]

Wording on Australia - there appears to be a are they in or not in at this moment. But it is clear that they are members of the AFF, so in that respect they are in and should be included in the page article. Until there is firm confirmation that they aren't in, they should be treated the same as any other member. If Australia don't play in 2014 AFF Championship, then the ASEAN Football Federation should really release a press statement announcing their none participation.

As for now, they should be included in the list just like any other member association but do they require any note? I don't think they do as all should be treated the same. It should though, be written into the article that Australia joined the AFF in such and such a date and are eligible for inclusion unless otherwise stated. Druryfire (talk) 14:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:ASEAN Football Championship which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:45, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:AFF Championship which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:45, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2014[edit]

Change lose record of Philippines from 0 to 1

Add goals to Philippines for P. Mulders 59' Neoren23 (talk) 14:06, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 19:15, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2014[edit]

Resolved
 – This has now been clarified in the article.

Request edit for Score updates and Venue changes (Philippine stadium to be changed) AgogogBunj (talk) 14:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the venues for the Semi Final matches that (the) Philippines are now part of? IanCleverly (talk) 14:48, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2014[edit]

Please ASAP edit AgogogBunj (talk) 14:18, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not requested a specific change.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 19:46, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Team of the Tournament[edit]

An edit has been made which includes a 'Team of the Tournament' with a reference. Since that reference is basically a journalists opinion of what said team could look like, would you therefore agree with me that it should be taken off? IanCleverly (talk) 19:40, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Timor L'este disqualification[edit]

Retrospective disqualification from this tournament and others due to fielding ineligible players . . . AFC Statement : Discussion HERE.

Matilda Maniac (talk) 11:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014 AFF Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]