|This page was nominated for deletion on 30 May 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.|
The fact that this number appears in 2 core sequences of the OEIS and 192 nice sequences contradicts the supposed non-notability of this number, in my opinion. Anton Mravcek 21:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
although originally, yes, this page deserved deletion, there is now enough information to keep it. Jesterjester 03:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
For some unknown reason 243 (number) redirects here. I have no idea why, nor how to fix that (or to understand why...). But it seems to me that it's pretty incorrect.