Talk:24 cm Haubitze 39

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Germany (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated B-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality assessment scale.

What needs to be footnoted here? Everything not in Hogg or Chamberlain & Ellis has a cite already. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:47, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, mate. The ammunition section does not have any in line citations, so if these could be added it would improve the article. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Suggested improvements[edit]

I have just added a B class checklist to the article. There is some good content, however, I believe that the article could be improved by addressing the following:

  • referencing and citation - as per above, not all paragraphs have an in line citation. For a B class there needs to be at least one in line citation per paragraph;
  • coverage - accuracy seems fine (although I'm no expert so probably can't assess that part properly), however, I think the article needs more content in relation to service history. Whilst there is some, I think it could be fleshed out a little more. e.g. campaigns it was used in, length of service, performance, etc.;
  • grammar - the article needs a copy edit for grammar and style. A number of sentences begin with the pronoun 'it', which I do not believe is appropriate because it does not specify what is being talked about; and
  • images - an image would greatly improve the value of this article.

Just some suggestions. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)