Talk:72 (number)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Numbers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 
WikiProject Kabbalah (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kabbalah, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kabbalah on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Judaism (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


Untitled[edit]

nevermind 72.66.249.231 15:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Wrong Field?[edit]

wouldn't the number of hours in three days be an astronomical example? I personally think so but i wanted to make sure before i put it in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DerBarJude (talkcontribs) 16:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


GTA4[edit]

Someone mention the 24 spoof in GTA4 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.67.88 (talk) 18:50, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


There should be a mention of the DTP point here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.87.151.1 (talk) 15:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

72 is not a highly composite number[edit]

72 is not a highly composite number: See the article on highly composite number, which lists the first dozen highly composite numbers and 72 is not in this list.

Note that "highly composite number" is NOT some phrase to be used on a whim, but rather there is a technical definition of this concept. 98.67.171.23 (talk) 04:05, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. Also, it has 12 divisors, not 11. The smallest number with exactly 11 divisors is 1024. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 11:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

  • http://www.ngcic.org/
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-23 17:08:25, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In IC 1337 on 2011-04-24 04:34:10, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-23 02:06:58, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 10 (number) on 2011-05-31 22:27:07, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 11 (number) on 2011-06-01 02:53:15, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 138 (number) on 2011-06-01 14:55:19, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 48 (number) on 2011-06-19 14:01:14, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'
    • In 52 (number) on 2011-06-19 20:05:38, Socket Error: 'getaddrinfo failed'

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)