Talk:777 (number)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Redirect[edit]

I dont think that the number 777 should redirect to the number 700. The two are completely unrelated.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.144.61.154 (talkcontribs) 17:24, 7 July 2007

Agreed. --walkingonthesun Say something to me 04:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Crowley[edit]

Aleister Crowley is not a Satanist, and therefore the head of the article should not be Satanist. While arguably elements of his religion Thelema, and he himself, could fall into some categories of Satanism, he was never directly associated with it (it is in fact after his time of life). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.31.234.68 (talkcontribs) 11:18, 31 July 2009

Numerology[edit]

Why is there no numerology in this article, and many other number articles?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.31.234.68 (talkcontribs) 11:20, 31 July 2009

Because there is a consortium of people who take it out that is why. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.160.222.24 (talk) 05:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Suggested Editions for Inclusion Into the Main Article[edit]

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.160.222.24 (talkcontribs) 07:47, 1 December 2009

The political examples seem fine if they can be sourced. And if someone's written about the 777/Jehovah/Crowley numerology then we can mention that in a couple of sentences. The rest seems like excessively detailed original research, though, and appears to be more about the number 666 than the number 777. --McGeddon (talk) 10:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
I confess I Samuel Moser posted the religious nature of 777 above and I was not allowed to add a indefinite article "a" before "Genesis Snake" and you should know "The Snake" in genesis was just Eve's Wisdom. "YESHUWA WAS NEVER SNAKE" = 777 in multiples of 3 through the alphabet so the story I posted is contrived in error and blasphemy for which I am repentant. 2605:A000:C745:2000:E98F:4746:75B3:6526 (talk) 02:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)