Talk:93rd Indiana Infantry Regiment

United States: Indiana / Louisville Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisville (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

copyedit[edit]

Took a shot at this, but it's too damaged for me to understand.

Cheers.Lfstevens (talk) 23:05, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have spent some time doing some major edits on this. I think it looks good enough. Did a lot of Copy edits, cleanup, formatting, etc. As per my opinion, I think it has been wikified and cleaned up pretty well..of course there is probably some bias there. I removed the issue as of now.DaltonCastle (talk) 07:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to mention, feel free to let me know if you think that was not sufficient enough to remove the issue. Any feedback is fine here, let me know, maybe put the issue back up, maybe add in some edits yourself, but I just want to clarify that this is resolved.DaltonCastle (talk) 07:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can I just remove the GOCE reviewed tag from this article, or is there something else to be done?--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]