Talk:9814072356 (number)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Numbers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 

I have removed these fromthe article, since they were relly only a bit of fun, but pu them here as they are interesting in a non-encyclopaedic way.

In other bases[edit]

2 100101000111101101101110000100100
3 221022221220112100100
4 21020331231300210
5 130044400303411
6 4301501344100
7 465126144564
8 111075556044
9 27287815310
10 9814072356
11 4186873900
12 1A9A868030
13 C0531C50A
14 6915A4DA4
15 3C68D3456
16 248F6DC24
17 16FA043EF
18 G09ED0E0
19 AIB9H700
20 7D6HJ0HG
21 598KIC6I
22 3KC6E500
23 2K6I3MF2
24 238CA01C
25 1F4O0FJ6
26 15K034DA
27 P8POE99
28 KA6LHC4
29 GEDME54
30 DDR44P6
31 B1OOO57
32 94FDN14
33 7JPG100
34 6C00HXX
35 5BUYMMB
36 4IB1MP0
37 3VJJ25V
38 39XPZ00

Roman numerals[edit]

 -
=======_______
MXDCCCXMMMMLXXMMCCCLVI where each overbar is a multiplier of 1000.

Rich Farmbrough 18:16, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

afd result[edit]

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 October 2005. The result of the discussion was Keep - 18 keep/15 delete (merge and move votes counted as keep) - 8 plain keep votes, 10 merge (including merge/redirect), 2 votes to just redirect. An archived record of this discussion can be found here.

Notability?[edit]

Why is this even an article entry? Is Wikipedia intended to be a calculator solution archive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spaluch1 (talkcontribs) 05:06, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Well, it has a couple of interesting properties and a couple of references, so I would say it passes our notability guideline on numbers at Wikipedia:Notability (numbers). Gandalf61 (talk) 08:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)