Talk:AACS encryption key controversy

; Archives
	Archive 1 (Roughly until May 5, 2007); Archive 2 (Roughly until May 15, 2007); Archive 3 (May 15, 2007 to present);

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

AACS encryption key controversy has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.

August 31, 2007

Good article nominee

Listed

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AACS encryption key controversy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Avoid personal attacks For disputes, seek dispute resolution	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

WikiProject Internet culture

(Rated GA-class, High-importance)

Internet portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

GA

This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do:

Article requests: Courage Wolf
Copyedit: Homestar Runner
Expand: Trent Vanegas, Freewebs, Stickam
Stubs: Pick one from Category:Stub-Class Internet culture articles, or elsewhere.
Update: All your base are belong to us
Other: Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

WikiProject Computing

(Rated GA-class, Low-importance)

Information technology portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

GA

This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Computer Security / Computing

(Rated GA-class, Low-importance)

Computer security portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

GA

This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (marked as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
There's a few article requests here: Category talk:People associated with computer security#To Do
Discuss the WholeSecurity and Norton AntiBot merger here
Clean up, source and expand the Gumblar article
Improve Wicked Rose. Article was PROD'ed and saved, looks like a possible good article.
Re-assess the Rootkit article; this article could be pushed to B-class.

[edit] Parallel universes?

This article and High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection must live in parallel universes. There, an administrator keeps removing even links to the original post of the master key on pastebin, despite the fact that the pastebin link is given in article appearing in a couple of respectable computing web magazines, CNET and PC Magazine. What happened to WP:KEYSPAM and WP:ELNEVER here?? Tijfo098 (talk) 03:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

How does WP:KEYSPAM support having the link exactly? --Cybercobra (talk) 04:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't know or care because it's a non-binding essay, but the admin removes [1] [2] the reference link (which is cited in CNET and PC Magazine) because ELNEVER does not allow links which encourage copyright violations. By that account, the ZDNet and Inquirer links used here serve exactly the same purpose, never mind the actual keys themselves, which are posted in full here. If you remove the sources per ELNEVER, as he did, then you wouldn't be able to include any key here. Tijfo098 (talk) 05:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

[edit] by the way

Kenneth, what are the prime factors? —Tamfang (talk) 05:30, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/05/02/digital-rights-management-tech-cx_ag_0502digg.html
- In Digg on 2011-03-17 10:12:51, 404 Not Found
- In HD DVD on 2011-03-22 17:37:45, 404 Not Found
- In AACS encryption key controversy on 2011-06-19 22:30:18, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

[edit] MKB v25 keys found

Processing keys up to MKB v25 have been published here and appear to be genuine. Obviously "processing keys for versions past 10 have not yet been released" needs to be updated, but I'm not sure whether it's best to

Just mention the fact that the new keys have been found,
Provide that link to the keys, or
Quote the full list of keys in the Wikipedia article itself

Gkmac (talk) 21:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Talk:AACS encryption key controversy

Contents

[edit] Parallel universes?

[edit] by the way

[edit] Dead link

[edit] MKB v25 keys found

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

Interaction

Toolbox

Print/export