Talk:AIL Storm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article AIL Storm has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Automobiles (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Brands (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Israel (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Military history (Rated GA-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality assessment scale.

Good article candidate 2007-07-17[edit]

I am placing this article on hold, due to the "quality" issues that are holding this article back from GA status. Here is a list of problems that need to be fixed before this article can pass.

  • Images need to better placed for aesthetical reasons. In fact there are too many for an article of this size. Consider including a link to the Wikimedia Commons.
  • Image captions are sloppy in some cases.
  • Numerous unsourced statements, and where the information is referenced, it does not follow the citation guidelines (author name, title, publisher, accessdate, etc)
  • There are way too many poorly structured one sentence paragraphs. You need to either merge these with other sentences or elaborate on them.
  • Why include red links in the "See also" section?
  • The infobox does not really comply with the WikiProject Automobiles standards, and the generational box should probably be used in the "Storm II", and "Storm III" sections. --OSX (talkcontributions) 08:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
The article has improved significantly, but a second review has led me to spot more issues.
  • All metric units need to have conversions to imperial units in parentheses.
  • The lead does not seam to adequately summarise the subject, try adding another paragraph or two.
  • Infobox still not resolved. "Chrysler 3.983 litre 6-cylinder in-line petrol with fuel injection developing 180 hp at 4,700 rpm, fitted with Vortox 2-stage air cleaner or VW 2.5 litre 4-cylinder turbocharged diesel developing 118 hp at 4,200 rpm" is not right. it should be: 4.0 L Chrysler 6-cylinder<br />2.5 L VW turbocharged diesel 4-cylinder. You should even find out the exact engine model and link it to that, and include the rest of the information in the prose. OSX (talkcontributions) 05:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Sorry that I hadn't gotten around to replying earlier. I hope that I've corrected the language, referencing, and lead issues, and I've just corrected the infoboxes' formatting and measurement unit conversion. While Flymeoutofhere took care of them, I wanted the WP:REDLINKs per that philosophy of expansion infrastructure - does the MoS disagree? I am also uneasy about leaving out the sole image - perhaps you can think of another image arrangement? As for the engines, the ones that exist on WP are wikilinked. Do let me know what you think. Cheers, TewfikTalk 03:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
Good work, but I feel that the article is missing some valuable citations. These instances have been marked with {{fact}} tags so you no exactly what needs to be done. Besides that I think the article is up to standard, so if you renominate it, I will most likely pass it. Cheers OSX (talkcontributions) 06:00, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Good article candidate 2007-10-26[edit]

I am not going to re-review this article because my only objections in my last review were the missing references. Additionally, the article has hardly changed much content-wise since my last review either (see archive). So as this article meets all the criteria, I hereby promote it to good article status. OSX (talkcontributions) 07:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Automatic addition of "class=GA"[edit]

A bot has added class=GA to the WikiProject banners on this page, as it's listed as a good article. If you see a mistake, please revert, and leave a note on the bot's talk page. Thanks, BOT Giggabot (talk) 04:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)