Talk:A Shot at Love II with Tila Tequila

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

elimination table colors[edit]

The colors for the elimination table are going to have to be tweaked so that the colors are not too harsh on the eyes. Just my honest opinion. I don't know which colors to use though. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 20:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

more like season one[edit]

This page should be formated like season 1. I don't know much about that part of editing wiki so I can't help. I just know how to add information. Someone who worked on the season 1 page should work on this one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.142.77.23 (talk • contribs)

I went through and made it look like season 1's page as best as I could. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 17:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

lauryn's location[edit]

lauryn lives in perth amboy, as i've seen on the show under her name. why does it say sayreville? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.190.186 (talk) 02:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elimination table[edit]

Why does everybody try to think of a reason on their own of somebody being eliminated on the show? If Tila doesn't state the reasons, then why are people putting reasons made-up on there? Thanks!

Tila actually stated all those reasons. They aren't made up. Just like the Season 1 table is accurate. The only time they are false is when vandals attack them. Flyer22 (talk) 04:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the reasons are absolutely the most hilarious thing I have ever encountered on Wikipedia. My sides hurt. User:Dfiner

LOL. True. Flyer22 (talk) 03:20, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this even necessary? We are just wasting bandwidth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.233.38.36 (talk) 20:49, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to answer this earlier, but I'll answer it now. It's more like why not include the reasons, discounting the vandals who will occasionally vandalize them. It's extra information that fits well into the article and gives insight into why Tila eliminated each contestant, for anyone who does not buy the DVD's of this show. As for bandwith, Wikipedia is huge. It's not hurting Wikipedia's room. Flyer22 (talk) 15:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still in the running and eliminated[edit]

I thought Kyle was eliminated, why does it say that he is still in the running? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean82196 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop putting your "Still in the Running" format in this article. It's not even needed. I've already explained on your talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 04:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

episode after episode 9[edit]

The next episode to come after episode 9 (Three-Way Getaway) is called "Reunion"... I don't know if this is episode 10, or a special. Does anyone have anymore information on this before we add it to the article? Clarification is going to be needed when it gets added if it's not Episode 10. —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 03:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I just answered my own question by actually watching the episode —TRAiNER4 (talk • contrib) 04:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

people who keep editing[edit]

STOP IT NOW WE WILL FIND OUT TUESDAY IF YOU EDIT IT AGIAN THEN BACK IT UP IF YOU CAN DO THAT THEN WELL KEEP IT THAT WAY OTHER WISE STOP NOW--Spiderman2351 (talk) 01:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)Spiderman2351[reply]

HEAR HEAR! AMEN! THANK YOU! FINALLY SOMEONE WITH SENSE!!! --Chrismaster1 (talk) 00:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you--Spiderman2351 (talk) 01:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Spiderman2351[reply]

The controversy[edit]

The controversy about this show is covered in its Season 1 article...so, IP, or anyone else, do not slander Tila Tequila on this talk page. That is not what Wikipedia talk pages are for, especially when you are citing your own personal information. Flyer22 (talk) 01:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kristy is bisexual[edit]

Why do they have kristy as a lesbian when she is bisexual because there is a difference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.223.30 (talk) 22:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We don't call her either of those words. This series was advertised as 15 straight males and 15 lesbian women. She is called a lesbian in this series. And, really, plenty of women who self-identify as "bisexual" are called lesbians. This article lists her as a contestant and gives a little information about her time on this series. This article does not directly call Kristy a lesbian, unless you count the lead/intro, which it seems you do. But, as stated before, that is how MTV advertised this series. Flyer22 (talk) 23:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, actually, there's also bisexual women who are classified as straight as well. Take Bret Michaels show, Rock of Love 2 for example, Daisy who was the runner up, is bi-sexual but yet she made it to the final elmination on the show. But like Flyer22 mentioned, it's all depends on how the network advertises it. --Chrismaster1 (talk) 00:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone please change the Contestant Chart at the bottom.[edit]

Please ban the person who kept changing the chart.

Thanks Lajolla2009 (talk • 07:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Raye Richards" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Raye Richards has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 5 § Raye Richards until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow • talk 23:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]