Talk:Aamir Khan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Biography / Actors and Filmmakers (Rated B-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (marked as High-importance).
 
WikiProject India / Maharashtra / Mumbai / Television (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (marked as Mid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian television workgroup (marked as Mid-importance).
 

CHANGE DP[edit]

Copied[edit]

I think a section needs to be added on his plagurised films. Hes had a few films which have been taken from Hollywood and i think these need to be mentioned in the article. In particular Lagaan as he was responsible for the script.

List of Sources for the re-constructing of the article.[edit]

Early Life[edit]

http://www.koimoi.com/actor/aamir-khan/

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/deconstructing-aamir-khan/1048773/

http://www.firstpost.com/topic/person/aamir-khan-aamir-khans-early-days-in-bollywood-video-I3uh2PoDqpw-5604-1.html

http://www.fpif.org/articles/bollywood_gets_political

http://www.mid-day.com/news/2011/may/180511-Kabul-Pathan-community-Hindi-films-Bolly-Khans

http://businessofcinema.com/news/spotted-aamir-khan-on-haj-pilgrimage-with-mother-zeenat-hussain/53160

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/aamir-khan-hajj-pilgrimage-mecca-mother-zeenat-hussain/1/225616.html

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2008-09-29/did-you-know-/27903834_1_zakir-hussain-film-producer-tahir-hussain

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-08-07/news-interviews/33082475_1_aamir-khan-azad-rao-khan-satyamev-jayate

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Tabloid/Aamir-Khan-the-family-guy/Article1-909640.aspx

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-02-04/news-interviews/28130828_1_burial-ground-mustan-kunal-kohli

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/features/weekend-life/aamir-the-dependable/article4143679.ece

http://www.indianmirror.com/arts/celebrities/aamir-khan.html

http://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report_being-a-dad-the-best-role-life-could-offer-aamir-khan_1703109

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/topic/Aamir-Khan

to thanks[edit]

aamir im sundar im nepali i like ur job i want to se thanks ur viget nepal n my home twan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.79.193.41 (talk) 19:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Personal life - Link to Jessica hines is incorrect[edit]

The link to Jessica hines is to the wrong person, Jessica Hynes is an actress and not the same person as Jessica hines.

Jessica Hines does not have a wiki pages, she does have a twitter account at: https://twitter.com/londonishstyle

Could someone update the link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.73.181 (talk) 00:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Religion[edit]

Please change the religion of Aamir Khan as athiest, he has said that does not believe in any rituals[1] and Raj Kumar Hirani quotes Aamir to be an athiest[2]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.3.28.20 (talk) 17:31i, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

How does not believing in "rituals" equate to being atheist? --Geniac (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
It doesn't. There are many modern people of all religions who do not accept the efficacy of religious rituals, but maintain their religious identity. They may observe rituals for reasons of culture, tradition and performance, without truly "believing" literally that rituals affect reality objectively. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 04:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

RfC: Which image should be used in the infobox? Recent one or the older one?[edit]

Closing this RfC earlier. Consensus is quite clear that the image taken in 2013 should be used in the infobox. Jim Carter 11:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Which image should be used in the infobox? This one? (Taken 2013) or This one? (Taken 2014) - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 13:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)i

In general, I prefer an image that shows the person "at the top of their game" and if they are still active, a newer image. I think both images qualify on both scores and would not favor one over the other based on only a one year difference. I favor the 2013 image as expressing more personality, and better portraying his facial features. In addition, I prefer the 2013 image artistically Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:32, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
The 2013 image is a better head shot, of a higher quality, and is recent enough. -- KRIMUK90  06:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
The 2013 image is of better quality and as Cullen stated, better portrays his facial features. Meatsgains (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
  • I think the 2013 image is better as it shows Khan rather than the later one where everything but Khan has been cropped. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
2013 image looks better while the crop in the 2014 image is distracting me MeeGhaMan (talk) 14:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Dil Chahta Hai[edit]

"According to critics, the film broke new grounds by showing Indian urban youth as they really are today. The characters depicted were modern, suave and cosmopolitan. The film did moderately well and was a success mostly in urban cities."[3]

A 2007 source claiming the impact of the movie on today's youth. It is not working but and requires clarification, we can remove that whole thing now? It is already more than a while. నిజానికి (talk) 13:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC)