Talk:Actel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Actel is the leader? WHAT A BULLSHIT!!![edit]

This is falsive advertisement at least. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.80.190.82 (talk) 20:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


WikiProject Business (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Companies (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 


Corrected. Changed "leader" to "manufacturer".

85.222.21.198 (talk) 20:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately the rest content of article sounds like advertisement. It should be rewritten.

85.222.21.198 (talk) 20:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

While it does read a bit like an advertisement, they are the pioneer in flash based (rather than SRAM based) FPGAs and I believe their chips go into space more often than any other FPGA providers. So it's not unreasonable to call them a leader in flash based FPGAs.

207.114.203.5 (talk) 22:47, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Regardless whether their marketing department wrote the original article, it's still better than having to dig through their entire website to get a useful summary of who they are and what they do. Personally, I appreciate whoever wrote this entry. I think the whole ad-spam tag should be re-thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patent.drafter (talk

I removed some of the worst sentences from the intro, which seemed to have come straight from the Actel marketing department. I'm sure they have nice products (my interest in them brought me to this entry), but I'm so disgusted by their flagrant abuse of Wikipedia that, frankly, I'm a little turned off. The rest of the article could use a rewrite as well.superbatfish (talk) 18:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)