|WikiProject Graphic design|
|WikiProject Computing / Software||(Rated B-class, Low-importance)|
Neutrality in this Article?
Macromedia FreeHand has an opening alert that asks for further discussion on a major contributor to this article. The contributer has a close connection with its subject; meaning a FreeHand professional. From what I read, the neutral point of view seems adequate and supporting citations adhere to the statements made. I am not that major contributer but I did make some deletions earlier that were questionable. What do you all think? Can the alert be removed? --Maeric9 (talk) 23:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Maeric9 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- The reason I added the COI tag to article was because of the contributions of the user Freefreehand (talk · contribs) (who is now blocked). If you believe the neutrality is OK then I have no objections to you going ahead and removing the tag. OSborn arfcontribs. 23:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, that reasoning is understandable and as a Freehand software user myself (and contributer here), I went through the article and re-confirmed citations and looked for any possible bias issues; it all seems neutral enough. As I posted above, I removed some questionable references toward FreeFreehand.org (as can be seen in the edit history.)
- I will remove the COI tag today. --Maeric9 (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
FreeHand Suggestions for Article
• History of FreeHand and version features (see Adobe Illustrator wiki-page) and/or FreeHand First's http://www.design-tools.com/freehand/
• More details on Free FreeHand with articles cited. http://www.macworld.co.uk/procreative/news/index.cfm?newsid=3222489&pagtype=allchandate
• Professions using FH. (survey citation)
• Advantages of FreeHand compared to Illustrator. (specifics and citation)
• Add images: Object Panel introduced in MX. Version splash screens, icon, or packaging.
How about starting a petition for a universal binary version of the program?