This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
bump this article. this is a very important issue and should be brought to light and documented, please someone flesh it out more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 10:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Kotniski (talk) 17:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Agree but the new article needs a better name than "NYPD Tapes". How about "2010 New York City Police Department quota scandal"? Rhobite (talk) 22:48, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Tentative Disagree I'm not sure about this yet, but much of the story is about him, his taping, his being locked up, his lawsuit, etc. Also, as for the NYPD part of it, it may have started being about quotas, but the downgrading of big crimes like sexual assault and trumped up charges for others seems more important. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 06:14, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Strongly Disagree The BLP states: "If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, or is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. Getting featured on TAL, Village Voice, and repeated mentions of the huffington report don't qualify as low profile. I supposed you'd also bounce information about Frank Serpico? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Disagree: NYPD Tapes is not a specific enough name. The New York police likely have countless audiotapes and videotapes for various reasons; and there are likely countless other people's tapes about the New York police. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Disagree for the reasons given by other users above. The new proposed page name "NYPD tapes" doesn't sound right, and the alternative more specific page names sound rather long-winded. Seems simpler and cleaner to leave things as they are. Asteuartw (talk) 15:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
"Former officer" vs "suspended" from the NYPD?
Someone changed his title to "former officer", but last I heard he was only "suspended". ★NealMcB★ (talk) 06:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
How about we use the title "American hero", fits better. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 15:01, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
According to the book of Anal-Retentive Wikipediology for the Anal-Retentive Wikipedian, you need 8 internet citations that can be verified to claims of hero. Though I agree dude is a hero. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 17:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)