Talk:Air China

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Air China was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: March 13, 2008

WikiProject Companies	(Rated B-Class, High-importance)	CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject CompaniesCompanies articles
Companies portal v • d • e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.  High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject China	(Rated B-Class, High-importance)	ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
v • d • e This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.  High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Aviation / Airlines	(Rated B-Class)	AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WPAVIATIONaviation articles
Aviation portal v • d • e This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.  B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the airline project.

It is requested that an image or photograph of headquarters in Beijing be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Beijing may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Contents 1 Serious work 2 New logo? 3 WikiProject class rating 4 Fair use rationale for Image:AirChina.png 5 Failed GA Nominee 6 St. Louis partnership

[edit] Serious work

This article still needs some serious work. There are grammatical errors throughout and the structure could also be improved upon.

I think it is coming along nicely. Good job on the recent cleanups. Aep 23:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New logo?

Can someone confirm if this is the new logo?

File:Air China logo.gif

--Russavia 01:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:AirChina.png

Image:AirChina.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Failed GA Nominee

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): [[File:|16px]] b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   a (fair representation): [[File:|16px]] b (all significant views):

5. It is stable.

   

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

   a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

7. Overall:

   a Pass/Fail

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jannisri (talk • contribs)

[edit] St. Louis partnership

Does anyone have any new information on this? DaronDierkes (talk) 09:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Regarding this sentence in one of the footnotes:

"The plane was badly damaged and with a highly responsiable attutide towards its passengers,Air China didn't repair it but retired it"

The bit about "highly responsible attitude towards its passengers" sounds like PR spin and imo should be removed. U-238 (talk) 12:48, 24 February 2009 (UTC)