Talk:Airspeed Ltd.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Advanced engine?[edit]

Far be it from me to disagree with the great Norway, but a 250 hp engine in the 1930s is supposed to be a great loss of some sort? Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:42, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The aircraft design had already occurred and if a different AM compliant engine was needed at a higher cost then it's a financial loss for Airspeed.GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:39, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Airspeed Ltd./Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires infobox  Done
  2. Requires photographs
  3. Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  4. Requires copy edit for WP:MOS
Keith D (talk) 14:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 19:09, 17 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)