|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, please see this page.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
- 1 On the Margin (1966)
- 2 Fair use rationale for Image:Alan Bennett.jpg
- 3 Fair use rationale for Image:Beyond the Fringe.jpg
- 4 Enjoy
- 5 Youtube
- 6 slightly chippy Old Labour tone to his writing.
- 7 Thirty one years since when?
- 8 Copyright problem
- 9 He's gay isn't he?
- 10 Adverts
- 11 Image:Alan Bennett.jpg
On the Margin (1966)
This series was formerly described as "largely" erased. In fact, all six episodes still seem to be missing according to online sources. Philip Cross 19:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Alan Bennett.jpg
Image:Alan Bennett.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Beyond the Fringe.jpg
Image:Beyond the Fringe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I went to what I thought was a new play by Bennett, Feb 2007, at Watford Palace Theatre. Yet checking the article here I see Enjoy is referenced as being written in 1980. Was the play unperformed for 27 years, or was I mistaken in believing the play was new?--Dr Finkbottle (talk) 21:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- A reply almost a year later... You were mistaken in thinking it was new. The play you saw is indeed a revival. And, yes, sadly the play has not been mounted much in major theatres since it bombed in 1980. AB's diaries 1980-1990 (published in "Writing Home" ISBN 0571196675) cover the critical reaction to the original staging and the play coming off. ➨ ❝ЯEDVERS❞ has nothing to declare except his jeans 13:46, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
slightly chippy Old Labour tone to his writing.
- Fair point - that whole section ("Themes and characters in his work") is a mess. Much of it reads like a school essay - assertions such as "he is celebrated for his acute observations of vernacular northern speech" and "the hilarious facts-of-life talk" are quite clearly the writer's personal opinion, and the entire paragraph is unsourced and therefore reads like original research. I've tagged the section, and deleted the slightly bizarre and irrelevent coda about spies. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Seems to have been plagiarised from this article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/theatre/6603572/Alan-Bennett-shy-and-spiky---but-one-of-us.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 23:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
- Good piece of detective work! I've deleted that entire section, as it is, as you say, clearly lifted from the Telegraph article ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 22:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Thirty one years since when?
In Personal Life, it says: "...has lived in Camden Town in London for thirty one years...". If one were really interested to know how long or since when he's lived there, one would have to figure out when that section was written, and possibly do some mental arithmetic (a là "that was written two years ago, so he's lived there thirty-three years now, since 19XX"). Much easier and less ambiguous to re-write it as "...has lived in Camden Town in London since 19XX" in the first place; then this sentence won't need to be updated every year. --CRConrad (talk) 13:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- In a short section of Untold Stories prefatory to Diaries 1996–2004 (p. 179 of my HB edition) published in 2005, he writes of Camden Town as "where I have lived for the last forty years". Something like "since the mid-sixties" might be acceptable, or is it original research? According to this NYT article it was 'two decades' in 1989, referring specifically to his current address. William Avery (talk) 15:39, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
This article has been reverted to an earlier version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Text entered in  duplicated at least in part material from .
Compare the article's:
He also reveals in his biography that his parents disliked, and were made anxious by, what they called "splother", meaning excessive preening and fuss, and Bennett has always seemed to hate it, too. He is someone who backs into the limelight with every appearance of reluctant diffidence.
As he reveals in his marvellous and often moving volume of memoirs, Untold Stories, his parents...disliked, and were made anxious, by what they called "splother", meaning excessive preening and fuss, and Bennett has always seemed to hate it, too. He is someone who backs into the limelight with every appearance of reluctant diffidence.
Compare the article's:
There was much press excitement when it was revealed in the 1990s that he had had a love affair with his former cleaning lady, and the tabloid press camped outside his house asking questions about his love life through the letterbox.
There was much press excitement when it was revealed in the Nineties that he had had a love affair with his former cleaning lady, with the tabloids door-stepping his house in Camden Town and asking questions about his love life through the letterbox.
Such material cuts far too close for us to use.
Other content added by this contributor may have been copied from other sources and has been removed in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. Content added by other contributors subsequent to the introduction of this material can be restored if it does not merge with this text to create a derivative work. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. ----Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
He's gay isn't he?
Just been watching History Boys (in which gay characters have a major role). I vaguely remember that Bennett's gay (relevant since I'm sure there is an autobiographical element to the play/film) and went to Wikipedia to check. I'm surprised to find no ref to that. (except in the categories section at end). In fact there is virtually no ref to his private life at all. How come? I see from one of the talk posts there was once a section entitled Privale Life, but not more??? 126.96.36.199 (talk) 21:07, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I may be mistaken but it looks to me as though the image is reversed (i.e. flipped horizontally). Bennett's hair is normally parted on the left and, as the image stands, his shirt buttons are not on the usual side. Simon Coward (talk) 19:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)