Talk:Alessandro Achillini

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 22:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alessandro Achillini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth[edit]

The Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani (online version; I don't know how to access the book if there is one) has October 20. It lists several authorities, although I don't know if they related to the date. Italian WP (and others) also has the 20th, but without a specific reference. Matsen 1974, the main English-language book, and Britannica, have October 29. LilyKitty suggested this could be due to an O.S./N.S. difference, although that is speculation. The Gregorian calendar was introduced in Italy in 1582 (over a hundred years later) but it is true that if you project backwards, the difference in the 15th century would be 9 days. I don't know if doing this retrospective change is at all common. Matsen has a footnote, but I can't see it online. Hence the dodge in the article. David Brooks (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]