This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of television on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was not done. The disambiguation page seems to have the strongest support. Skomorokh 08:36, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
After getting no response to a merge tag for a week, I merged the unsourced Charmed article All Hell Breaks Loose into its season page. I was then going to create a disambiguation page, but realized that since there are only two articles left, that just having the link provided at the top of the page would be sufficient. All Hell Breaks Loose (Supernatural) is the primary topic, IMO, as it receives four times as many visitors as All Hell Breaks Loose (album). Ωphois 20:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC) Ωphois 20:02, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
That's a good idea about moving the Charmed article. However, it is now a redirect, so a dab page isn't needed. Ωphois 12:24, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
I support Anthony's idea. TJSpyke 17:28, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Disambiguation: "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Ωphois 17:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
The Charmed one shouldn't have een merged by you, so there are 3 topics. TJSpyke 19:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Per Wiki policy, I had every right to merge the Charmed page, so I don't know what you are talking about. Ωphois 19:54, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
I'm fine with having a dab page, but I don't see the point in having one merely to facilitate a redirect. Ωphois 19:55, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Per Wiki policy, I could undo the merge if I wanted to. There are 3 possible targets for the name, so I formally Oppose the move request. TJSpyke 21:01, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Go ahead and unmerge it if you want and have a valid reason for doing so. Just please don't falsely accuse me of violating policies. Anyways, I'm fine with a dab page. Ωphois 21:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Oppose This is definitely not what people will expect at the undisambiguated title, the dab page should be and always should have been at the primary name. 188.8.131.52 (talk) 06:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.