Talk:Allegory in the Middle Ages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Middle Ages (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Poor article[edit]

A literal interpretation is NOT a type of 'allegory': It is a type of interpretation so the whole "4 types" section is a poor representation of allegory. The suggestion that Philo was the first to write allegorically is totally misleading as there is allegory in Prophets like Ezekiel and there is allegorical interprtation of Biblical books in many of the writings in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Enochic works have allegories of Noah and the animals in the ark. I think this article needs scrapping until it is better researched- as it is so misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.118.42 (talk) 18:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GA criteria changes[edit]

There's been quite a bit of discussion concerning making inline citations mandatory, so just a fair warning, this article may be delisted soon if those books can't be shown to actually be referencing this article. Also, I think it could use some general expansion, but that's just me, the citation thing is probably the biggest concern. Homestarmy 17:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Good article reassessment[edit]

I am listing this for a Good Article Review, on the basis of the lack of any citations. As it stands, this reads a whole lot like original research. Pastordavid 19:21, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

You could have just delisted this: GAR is for disputed or controversial reassessments. Anyhow, I'm delisting it now. Geometry guy 11:07, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
PS. The GAR discussion can be found here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geometry guy (talkcontribs) 11:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree, this does read more like a piece of personal research. I have changed one of the most contentious bits, "The Divine Comedy. Probably the greatest medieval work of literature, and the greatest work of allegory ever written". That is not acceptable in Wikipedia, as that suggests quality is somehow on a fixed scale rather than being relative. 9/4/09.

typology and allegory[edit]

This was added by someone at some point in the main article but really is a gloss on the article and belongs on the talk page:

(The paragraphs above do not seem to distinguish between typology and allegory, but there is an important distinction. This distinction is debated, but there are many books and articles published on the topic. See for example, the collection edited by John Whitman entitled Interpretation and Allegory: Antiquity to the Modern Period. Moreover, the term anagogical may refer to a transcendent or spiritual state of mind, not necessarily prophetic events. An anagogical interpretation, then, may lead the mind to contemplate and know spiritual things, transcendent of the material world, which is not the same as knowledge of future events.)

-- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)