From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Former good article Aluminium was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Elements (Rated C-class, Top-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Top  This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
Note icon
This article is a vital article.
Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team / Vital
WikiProject icon This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Version 0.5
Peer review This Natsci article has been selected for Version 0.5 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.

Aluminum vs. Aluminium[edit]

Moved to Talk:Aluminium/Spelling#Aluminum_vs._Aluminium

In Canada the usual spelling is Aluminium although both are used. See, for example, [1] and [2]. The two small references to spelling in Canada need correcting accordingly.

Semi-protected edit request on 26 September 2014[edit]

In the section

   7.1 Alzheimer's disease

It will be correct to add the below new findings about the correlation between Alzheimer Disease and Aluminium:

thank you Ste Df (talk) 07:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template.  LeoFrank  Talk 16:11, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Strange unit[edit]

Under "Health concerns" there is written:

there is evidence of some toxicity if it is consumed in amounts greater than 40 mg/kg/day.

The unit mg/kg/day does not make sense. I would expect an amount per unit of time. Can someone check this? There is a reference, but I do not have access to the paper. Hulten (talk 16:21, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Seems clear as mg/kg of body mass/day. Vsmith (talk) 21:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Okay, this is clear now. Other people may also not understand, so I clarified it in the article. Hulten (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)