This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
NPOV:Alabama Cooperative Extension System, written almost entirely by a news and public affairs employee at ACES, so needs some neutral eyes to give it a going-over to check for both neutrality, and layout/content inclusion, etc.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was closed
I would suggest moving the article to Amazon (online retailer) to represent a worldwide view on the topic. Also I have noticed that Amazon have dropped the .com suffix in their logo on their American website and refer to themselves as Amazon on information pages e.g. Amazon and Our Planet. Within the English Speaking World Amazon also trades in Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. On those websites Amazon uses the local web suffix in the logos. I do not know what Canadians or Australians call it but in the UK most people just call it Amazon. I remember Americans calling it Amazon.com but in a video about the Kindle a US commentator said he was asked if it was that Amazon thing. That might suggest that at least some Americans moved on but I cannot be absolutely sure. Tk420 (talk) 20:20, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Strongly disagree. Current front page still uses Amazon.com at least six times, including twice in the footer, once as a graphic logo and once again as text. And their Investor Relations section of their site repeatedly refers to the company as Amazon.com. Did you actually bother to look around their Web site before you posted that suggestion? --Coolcaesar (talk) 05:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
There was a similar move request only six months or so ago, and the clear consensus appears to have been against any such move. Did you check the archives on this talk page before initiating this discussion? Consensus can change over time, but usually we try to give it a bit more breathing room than this. Usually it's better not to have the same discussion again in such a short time, forcing everyone to repeat their earlier input, unless you believe that there were significant issues missed in the earlier discussion. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
No response from the nominator for three weeks, so I think we can safely say that this proposal has been abandoned, without prejudice to anyone else who wants to raise the issue in the future. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
There is no mention of "Amazon Smile" in the article, smile.amazon.com, where part of the purchase goes to the charity of your choice. I think that should be in the article. Bubba73You talkin' to me? 07:49, 30 October 2014 (UTC)