Talk:Amazon Web Services

Needs reorganization ; reads like bad code

I suggest (and i'll volunteer later tonight/this week) that a re-org be done on page structure. To wit, the list of services.. Alphabetical just sends the reader all over the place changing gears.. If the services were grouped by basic or general purpose/functionality (eyeball services, dba services, consumer, grid, enterprise, etc) - it would make the article a lot easier to parse. As it stands right now, I'd rather just go to the aws site and hope that they have a better explanation than this page. We can do better.. --Badboyjamie (talk) 18:52, 28 Feb 2011 (UTC)

Stub

I think this page is too big to be a stub replaced it with expand --Abc518 (talk) 20:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

other meanings for AWS?

i hear this acronym used for other things? What else it stands for? StupidFrog 03:52, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

AWS has the answer for you. --Shepard (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Removing "Similar or related services"

The content in "Similar or related services" doesn't belong on this page; it should be on a page about web service providers if there is one. I'd like to remove it. If there are no objections, I'll remove it in a few days, if I remember. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamGomaa (talk • contribs) 19:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Critical criticism

Since when was OK to cite defunct blogs as sources of criticism .. power outages, spam?? come on! if you can't spot the fraudulent character behind these criticisms then it's not your call to make the necessary changes to this article. I'm deleting this section until someone else steps in and clear this up.

Just to make my point replace "Amazon web services" with whatever service you can imagine the resulting criticism is equally true. In my mind that's singling out one service for something that has been present in any service sometime.

Please don't call my blog defunct. My criticism was real, and I have records on said blog to back up the criticism of this service (some screen captures even). Also, please note the criticism placed on wikipedia, was not written by me. The original articles are still accessible here http://www.spambotsecurity.com/blog/archives/2009/04/entry_36.php and here http://www.spambotsecurity.com/blog/archives/2009/07/entry_52.php . If someone else wishes to revert and place the links back up, I would not be in the least bit offended. 66.119.63.132 (talk) 02:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC) Zaphod