Talk:American Pie Presents: Beta House

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject United States (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Film (Rated GA-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
 
News

Fair use rationale for Image:American Pie 6.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:American Pie 6.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:22, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

American Pie 7[edit]

Amrican Pie 7 has been announced last month, and I see now one has created a page for it yet. I would do it myself but I don't know how. So if anyone is wiling to write it...here's the article

http://www.moviehole.net/200816840-steinberg-on-american-pie-7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.169.99 (talk) 01:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

We'll wait until more information is released to make another article. --132 21:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

pledge board[edit]

hey listen the pledge board has disappeared from this doccument this is unfair Kyle25157 (talk) 12:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

References[edit]


The below are unreliable sources. Do NOT add them to the article. Thanks! Alex Douglas (talk) 16:32, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:American Pie Presents: Beta House/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Taylor Trescott (talk · contribs) 20:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

This has been sitting in the queue for a while, so I'll handle it. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 20:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

  • "seven [to] eight weeks" - Why does this need to be quoted? You can just rephrase it yourself.
  • "While largely overlooked by critics" This appears to be WP:OR - there aren't any sources saying this.
  • "he hasn't ejaculated for a few months" - "discovering he'd had sex" - Watch for MOS:N'T
  • "on aspects of writer Lindsay's own life" We can drop the "writer" here; we know he wrote the movie already.
  • "It was rated R by the Motion Picture Association of America, due to "pervasive strong crude and sexual content, graphic nudity, language and excessive drinking," per WP:FILMRATING you should remove this.
  • "However, not all reviews were negative. IGN's Hock Teh gave the film 5/10" That doesn't exactly sound positive.

I place this on hold. It's short, but covers what is known about the film. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 21:16, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article. I have made the suggested edits. FilmTVComicsNerd (talk) 10:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)